Laruelle’s ‘Criminally Performative’ Thought: On Doing and Saying in Non-Philosophy
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Pragmatism and Metaphysics in Brandom’s Between Saying and Doing
The paper inquiries into Brandom’s conception of pragmatistic metaphysics, as outlined at the end of Between Saying and Doing. In the reconstruction proposed, the combination of pragmatism and analytical philosophy that is at the basis of Brandom’s program seems to have many aspects in common with the critical and dialectical conception of metaphysics that we find in Kant and Hegel. My paper is...
متن کاملThe gap between saying and doing in postoperative pain management.
AIM To understand how nurses contribute to postoperative pain management in a surgical setting and to identify barriers to achieving optimal postoperative pain alleviation. BACKGROUND Postoperative pain is inadequately managed. Nurses play an important role in assessment, treatment and evaluation of postoperative pain in surgical wards, but combined observational and interview studies about h...
متن کاملAnchoring Design in Rural Customs of Doing & Saying
An increasing range of initiatives aim to enable rural communities in developing regions to generate their own, non-text based, digital content to share local stories, information and concerns. Video, photos and audio offer new resources for practices that give communities’ a sense of identity and continuity and that members acquire in relationships with each other, their environment and histor...
متن کاملBetween Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism
Classical AI-functionalism is the claim that there is some program such that anything that runs that program can pass the Turing test, that is, can deploy a vocabulary in the same sense in which any other language-users do. And that is to say that a computer language, in which any such algorithm can be expressed, is in principle VP-sufficient to specify abilities that are PV-sufficient to deplo...
متن کاملBetween Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism
Pragmatic definitions of material incompatibility and two kinds of consequence: • Incompatibility of p and q: If S is committed to p, then S is not entitled to q. • Committive consequence: If S is committed to p, then S is committed to q. • Permissive consequence: If S is committed and entitled to p, then S is (prima facie) entitled to q. " And those who introduce the notion of connexion say th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Performance Philosophy
سال: 2015
ISSN: 2057-7176
DOI: 10.21476/pp.2015.1122